Government departments and authorities
Planning, regulation and compliance.
The priority is defensibility: every figure traceable, every decision logged, every submission consistent with the last.
The products describe what the software is. This page describes what it is for. Start from the decision in front of you, and we will point you at the part of the platform that carries it.
Each of these is a real workflow inside a groundwater department, and each has a specific answer in the platform. Nothing here repeats the product pages — this is where you look when you know the problem but not the module.
You need recharge, extraction and category for every assessment unit, computed on a consistent method, with the workings preserved for scrutiny — and you need it before the deadline, not after.
Carried by ABMIS, reading the approved record from HydroGeoSenZ
Slope, land use, lithology, soil and rainfall have to be read together against observed water-level behaviour, so that structures are sited where they will actually recharge — and the choice can be justified to the funding authority.
Carried by HydroGeoSenZ spatial analytics, with basin parameters from ABMIS
Well and spring census work is expensive and usually read once. Linked to the aquifer framework it becomes a live picture of dependency, density and stress rather than a static register.
Carried by GroundWatch for capture, HydroGeoSenZ for analysis
Drought and extraction pressure announce themselves in the record months before they announce themselves in the field — if the record is clean enough to read and someone is watching it.
Carried by HydroGeoSenZ forecasting and anomaly detection
Before a dataset can support a decision, somebody has to establish which parts of it can be relied upon. That is a data-quality programme, and it needs instrumentation rather than opinion.
Carried by GroundWatch verification, HydroGeoSenZ validation
Tables, maps and category statements in the shape the receiving office expects, generated from the same data the department has been working in all year — not rebuilt in a spreadsheet the week before.
Carried by ABMIS reporting
<nadasd>
Planning, regulation and compliance.
The priority is defensibility: every figure traceable, every decision logged, every submission consistent with the last.
Scientific analysis and modelling.
The priority is access to clean, documented data and the freedom to interrogate it without a developer in the loop.
Operational management.
The priority is the next decision — which wells, which season, which intervention — delivered simply enough to act on.
Most departments need help getting from where their data is to where the platform can use it. That work is a service, priced and scoped as one, and it does not require a licence to begin.
Establishing what a historical dataset can and cannot support.
Method review and interpretation alongside your own hydrogeologists.
Data-led appraisal of where intervention will repay the investment.
Boundary preparation, aquifer framework build-out and spatial analysis.
Onboarding, documentation and the follow-through that makes adoption stick.
Tell us which part of your groundwater programme is costing you the most time, and we will show you what the platform does about it — on your own basin geometry.